Vol. 17 No. 03 Mar 2002
Resort Development Pressue Confronts High Sierra Valley
1 March 2002 - 1:00am | Author: Paul ShigleyDevelopment pressure in the Martis Valley, just north of Lake Tahoe, is as great as anywhere in the high Sierra. Straddling the Placer and Nevada county line about 20 miles southwest of Reno, the area appears to be evolving into a high-end resort destination. Several thousand homes and vacation units are proposed in unincorporated Placer County and the Town of Truckee, as are at least half a dozen golf courses.
Price: $2.95Tiered EIR Thrown Out Because Higher Tier Invalid
1 March 2002 - 1:00am | Author: otherA tiered environmental impact report has been thrown out because the program EIR on which the tired document was based had been invalidated. The Second District Court of Appeal ruling came in a case involving the Castaic Lake Water Agency’s proposed purchase of water from Kern County to serve Newhall Ranch and other development in Los Angeles County’s Santa Clarita Valley.
Price: $2.95County Can Require Indemnity Agreement From Permit Applicant
1 March 2002 - 1:00am | Author: otherA county can require an applicant for a development permit to indemnify the county in any attempt brought by a third party to void the permit, according to an opinion from the Attorney General’s office.
Price: $2.95County Prevented From Recoveing Criminal Code Enforcement Costs
1 March 2002 - 1:00am | Author: otherCounties do not have the authority to recover the cost of investigation and criminal prosecution of code infractions, the Fourth District Court of Appeal has ruled. The court held that cities do have the power to recover the costs of criminal code enforcement activities, but state law treats counties differently.
Price: $2.95District Trumps City For Providing Wastewater Service, Panel Rules
1 March 2002 - 1:00am | Author: otherA sanitation district has exclusive jurisdiction to provide sewer service to an area annexed by Corona, and the city cannot interfere with that right, the Fourth District Court of Appeal has ruled. The lawsuit was forced by the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission’s decision 16 years ago not to decide who would provide sewer service to the area.
Price: $2.95Court Rules Chula Vista Agency Can Take Non-Blighted Property
1 March 2002 - 1:00am | Author: other A Superior Court ruling that blocked the Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency from condemning a 3.2-acre parcel has been overturned by the Fourth District Court of Appeal. The appellate panel rejected all arguments from the landowner and ruled that the city’s eminent domain lawsuit was an appropriate action that served the public use.
In 1974, Chula Vista adopted the Bayfront Redevelopment Project for territory west of Interstate 5. In 1998, the redevelopment agency amended the project area to include land
Price: $2.95Lower Population Projections Could Reduce Housing Strain
1 March 2002 - 1:00am | Author: otherPopulation projections beget households, households beget units and units beget Regional Housing Needs Assessments (RHNA) and those infamous housing elements.
Price: $2.95In Brief
1 March 2002 - 1:00am | Author: otherHere is California Planning & Development Report's patent pending digest of this month's hottest news briefs about planning and development in the Golden State.
Price: $2.95Sacramento Tax-Sharing Bill Forces Regionalism Issue, But Opposition Holds Firm
1 March 2002 - 1:00am | Author: William FultonPerhaps no legislative proposal in recent memory has cut closer to the bone of California’s state-local governance problems than AB 680, Assemblyman Darrell Steinberg’s proposal to create a tax-sharing system for metropolitan Sacramento.
Price: $2.95Housing, Bonds Top Lawmakers’ Priority Lists
1 March 2002 - 1:00am | Author: otherConsensus may be rare in Sacramento, but nearly everyone agrees on one thing this year: proposals that cost money are doomed. Despite the lack of money — or maybe because there is no money — lawmakers could still pass a number of policy bills related to planning.
Price: $2.95
