Vol. 19 No. 01 Jan 2004
Retail Needs, Local Standards Conflict In State's Urban Settings
1 January 2004 - 1:00am | Author: June D. BellRiverside's University Village — where city officials permitted a 25% reduction of required parking spaces — is evidence that when merchants, developers and a municipality are willing to flex, new retail development can thrive in existing urban areas.
Price: $2.95Las Lomas Could Be Next Southern California Battleground
1 January 2004 - 1:00am | Author: Paul ShigleyA proposed 5,800-unit housing development in the rugged hills between the San Fernando Valley and Santa Clarita is generating controversy, intergovernmental friction and litigation even before an environmental impact report has been produced.
Price: $2.95State Found Liable For Damages From 1986 Yuba County Flood
1 January 2004 - 1:00am | Author: CP&DR StaffAn appellate court has found the state liable for costly damages to property in Yuba County as the result of a 1986 Yuba River levee failure. The decision arrived within days of Gov. Schwarzenegger’s reduction of $105 million from local flood control project budgets, and the decision comes as construction of thousands of homes in the same floodplain proceeds.
Price: $2.95Court Rejects 1970s Parcel Map, Excludes Lots From Subdivision
1 January 2004 - 1:00am | Author: CP&DR StaffThe Sixth District Court of Appeal has allowed a Santa Clara County landowner to exclude his property from a subdivision approved in 1970. The exclusion was permitted by a rarely used provision of the Subdivision Map Act.
Price: $2.95Counties Fight Over Traffic From Proposed Foothills Resort
1 January 2004 - 1:00am | Author: CP&DR StaffCalveras County supervisors approved a 3,250-acre residential and golf course resort project near the lower foothills community of Copperopolis in mid-December. The following day, the Tuolumne County Board of Supervisors voted to sue its northern neighbor because of traffic concerns about the project.
Price: $2.95Central Valley Air District Plans Impact Fee On Development
1 January 2004 - 1:00am | Author: Paul ShigleyLong criticized as a regulatory laggard, the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District appears to be only one year away from becoming the first air district in the state to levy air quality impact fees on all new developments. The proposed fee would be based on the size and type of project, and development proponents whose projects meet certain criteria could minimize or avoid the fee all together.
Price: $2.95Bush Administration Backs Away From Relaxed Wetlands Regulations
1 January 2004 - 1:00am | Author: CP&DR StaffThe Bush administration announced it has dropped a plan to relax federal regulation of wetlands.
For most of 2003, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers worked on a proposal to redefine which streams, ponds, wetlands and other seasonal and permanent bodies of water would be protected under the Clean Water Act.
Price: $2.95Court Rules Mitigation For Loss Of Farmland Is Infeasible
1 January 2004 - 1:00am | Author: CP&DR StaffAn appellate court has rejected the argument that a project leading to the loss of farmland should have been mitigated with the establishment of agricultural easements on other farmland.
Price: $2.95Appellate Court Throws Out Burbank Airport Ballot Initiative
1 January 2004 - 1:00am | Author: CP&DR Staff An initiative passed by Burbank voters that sought to restrict the expansion of Burbank Airport has been struck down by the Second District Court of Appeal.
The unanimous three-judge appellate panel ruled that the State Aeronautics Act gives legislative authority for airport expansions and relocations exclusively to City Councils and Boards of Supervisors, thereby prohibiting initiatives and referenda.
Price: $2.95Santa Cruz Opens The Door To Second Units
1 January 2004 - 1:00am | Author: Morris NewmanThe booklet titled "Accessory Dwelling Unit Manual" may not hit The New York Times bestseller list any time soon. But this unprepossessing little booklet is dynamite because it promotes the least popular type of housing in California.
Price: $2.95
