About CP&DR | Email Newsletter | Solimar Research | Advertise | Submit Tips | Contact Us
Front Page | Subscribe | Bookstore | Archive | Paul's Links | Daily Shig (Blog)

Court Rejects After-The-Fact Mitigation Of Impacts

| Author:

Mitigation measures taken after the issuance of a mitigated negative declaration do not satisfy the California Environmental Quality Act, the Second District Court of Appeal has ruled.

In a case involving a water district’s proposal to cover a small reservoir in the unincorporated Santa Barbara County community of Summerland, the court also ruled that the district should have considered the project’s potentially substantial impact to aesthetics.

Price: $2.95
» login or register to post comments | add to cart
» Subscribers Login or Purchase to view the article