Humboldt County

A proposed subdivision that undergoes environmental review and receives approval does not become a new project for California Environmental Quality Act purposes merely because the local government’s approval expires and a new subdivision map is submitted, the First District Court of Appeal has ruled. » read more | add to cart

A logging plan and endangered species permit that were part of the Headwaters Forest deal approved by the state in 1999 have been invalidated by the state Supreme Court. The court set important precedents by rejecting both a “sustained yield plan” and an “incidental take” permit held by Pacific Lumber Company. » read more | add to cart

The Humboldt County district attorney cannot sue Pacific Lumber Company for allegedly submitting false information during the state’s processing of an environmental impact report and sustainable logging plan, the First District Court of Appeal has ruled.

The court ruled that the district attorney’s lawsuit was blocked by a section of the state Civil Code and by the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, which protects lobbying and petitioning activities. The court did not rule on the legitimacy of Pacific Lumber’s allegedly fraudulent statements. » read more | add to cart

Spurred by a land use plan intended to remove Pacific Lumber Company from bankruptcy, the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors is moving toward adopting policies that would limit residential development on land zoned for timber production. » read more | add to cart

A lawsuit contending that a Eureka Redevelopment Agency deal for a waterfront development violated conflict of interest laws has been thrown out. The First District Court of Appeal upheld a trial court judge, who ruled the lawsuit was filed after the statute of limitations had expired. » read more | add to cart

The First District Court of Appeal has upheld the City of Eureka’s environmental impact report for a private school playground in a residential neighborhood.

» read more | add to cart