Connect with CP&DR

facebook twitter

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter

Subscribe to our Free Weekly Enewsletter

JPA Can Be Used To End-Run Vote Requirement, Fourth District Rules

publication date: Nov 23, 2015
View a Printer Friendly version of this page, allowing you to print the page. Send a summary of this page to someone via email.

The Fourth District Court of Appeal has rejected arguments from San Diegans for Open Government that the City of San Diego improperly created a joint powers authority in order to avoid a two-thirds vote requirement for issuing sale-leaseback Marks-Roos bonds.

San Diegans for Open Government - a plaintiff frequently used by watchdog lawyer Cory Briggs - sued the city, claiming that a joint-powers authority between the city, the San Diego Housing Authority, and the city's successor agency did not have the power to issue the bonds for several reasons. SDOG attempted to distinguish the situation from the facts of Rider v. City of San Diego (1998) 18 Cal.4th 1035, a California Supreme Court ruling which held, essentially, that the city could end-run the two-thirds requirement by creating a JPA. >>read more


This article is available for purchase for $5.00 - please click here for details.

Sorry this page is available to premium subscribers only.

If you are already a subscriber, please login.

If you're not a subscriber why not join today?

If you believe you should be able to view this area then please contact us and we will try to rectify this issue as soon as possible.


Job Announcements
Search this site

NEW E-EDITION JUST PUBLISHED: