It's difficult to believe that CEQA case law could get more complicated.

But it can, according to land-use lawyers who spoke at last week's UCLA Extension Land Use Law and Planning Conference.

During the last 12 months, Courts of Appeal have published about 25 California Environmental Quality Act cases — a huge increase from recent years.

No fewer than seven published cases dealt with the definition of a "project" under CEQA, according to Michelle Ouellette and Whit Manley, two leading CEQA attorneys at UCLA conference.

A slew of land use issues are converging on Stockton, an older Central Valley city that is simultaneously struggling to revitalize its downtown and deal with a political environment that is both pro-growth and environmentally conscious.

Court have issued four recent court decisions regarding eminent domain that suggest that acquiring property through eminent domain is an increasingly costly prospect for the government. None of the four decisions addressed whether the government had the right to take the property in question. Rather, the cases dealt with procedure and valuation.

The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta is one of the biggest ecological train wrecks in the nation, the focal point of a tectonic smash-up between human needs and natural dynamics. In consequence, it also has become perhaps the most-studied and squabbled-over body of water in the West. The latest contributions to that voluminous body of work are the final report of a governor-appointed "Blue Ribbon Task Force," and a federal court ruling.

The California housing market crashed during 2007, and only true optimists and a handful of industry groups predict a turnaround this year. The halcyon days of the housing boom already seem like a long ways away.

But while the downturn has reached nearly every corner of the state, some markets are stronger than others. In particular, exurban markets are weak, while urban markets focused on infill development are relatively strong.

An appellate court has blocked a controversial subdivision at the eastern base of Mt. Whitney because the project's environmental impact report did not adequately consider a potential land swap between the developer and the Bureau of Land Management.

A statewide cap on driving?

Here's the thing nobody is quite willing to say out loud about implementing California's climate change law in the land use arena: The state may have to place an overall cap on vehicle miles traveled (VMT), even as it must accommodate more growth.

Can "the Desert" handle a million people?

More to the point, can the Palm Springs/Coachella Valley region handle a million people without creating a huge mismatch in jobs and housing that will create a swell of outcommuting from the area into the more job-rich parts of Southern California.

An initiative that would prevent the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes and ban local rent control laws has qualified for the June ballot. The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and the California Farm Bureau Federation are the primary proponents. In addition, a competing, more limited measure that would prohibit the taking of owner-occupied, single-family houses for economic development has also qualified for the same June ballot.

A county cannot employ a development agreement to permit a use not otherwise allowed by zoning, the Fifth District Court of Appeal has ruled. The court said Tuolumne County could not use a development agreement allowing one agricultural property owner to conduct weddings and other events that are not allowed by the applicable zoning district and county zoning ordinance.

Sacramento may be flooded with red ink these days – after all, the state's grappling with a $14 billion budget deficit – but that's not the only immersion the locals are talking about. As the feds get tougher about flood hazards, should the city go back to living on stilts, as it did in the old days?

In almost shockingly candid interview with the Los Angeles Times, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger concedes that his earlier answers for solving the state's budget and governance problems were based on his poor understanding of the problems and the system.

You might recall the 2003 recall campaign, when Schwarzenegger said he could solve the state's budget problems simply by eliminating "waste, fraud and abuse." He now says these things are not a factor in the state's projected $14.5 billion budget deficit.

The Humboldt County district attorney cannot sue Pacific Lumber Company for allegedly submitting false information during the state's processing of an environmental impact report and sustainable logging plan, the First District Court of Appeal has ruled.

The court ruled that the district attorney's lawsuit was blocked by a section of the state Civil Code and by the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, which protects lobbying and petitioning activities. The court did not rule on the legitimacy of Pacific Lumber's allegedly fraudulent statements.