A collection of San Joaquin Valley water technology companies is attempting to make Fresno the center of the "flow technology" world. Representatives of dozens of companies have been meeting regularly for nearly two years as part of the Water Technology Industry Cluster in hopes of boosting business and improving the San Joaquin Valley's economic status.
The cluster and California State University, Fresno, are trying to attract dollars to build a center at the university for research and development, testing, certification, education and marketing. The cluster has also joined with Fresno City College and Reedley College on a work force training program.
The effort has grown from a three-year-old study by Collaborative Economics for the Great Valley Center. The Palo Alto-based consultant found a number of indicators of poor economic health in the region. During the 1990s, construction and retail activity driven by rapid population growth was a major component of the regional economy. Yet the study reported that the labor force grew faster than jobs, and per capita income declined by about 5% in constant dollars from 1990 to 1997.
The study recommended the region move away from being a low-cost center and join the technology-driven global marketplace. To do this, the study urged the cluster approach, in which businesses in the same field collaborate on many fronts. Consultants identified six "opportunity areas" for potential clusters, all of which they said were "nascent and require significant scale-up to create critical mass."
The study's findings and recommendations gave San Joaquin Valley leaders something with which they could work.
"The prognosis was the regional economy was only going to get worse," said Ashley Swearengen, executive director of the Central California Futures Institute at CSU Fresno. "We missed the last wave (of prosperity) and every indicator was that we would miss the next wave."
With financial assistance from the Irvine Foundation, the cluster that has taken shape is in the field of water technology, which the study called "precision irrigation technology." Fresno State is already home to the Center for Irrigation Technology, and some of the world's leading companies in the area of moving, restricting, filtering and treating water are based in a region that stretches from Kern County to Modesto. Plus, many people see the provision, cleaning, recycling and conservation of water as a growing issue worldwide. The first cluster meeting was in April 2001.
"I really thought it was kind of a dumb idea," said Claude Laval, whose company, Claude Laval Corp., makes filtration equipment. "Most of these people had not collaborated with each other. Most of them hated each other."
Laval helped get people to attend the first meeting anyway. Since then, Laval has become a cluster co-chair. "It's better than waiting for some automobile manufacturer to build a factory in Fresno," he said.
The semi-monthly meetings now draw 60 to 70 people from around the country. Meetings are not all hugs and kisses, but people are talking and finding more common ground than they knew they had. Members now speak of "cross-fertilization."
Swearengen, who has helped get the cluster going, saw many "false barriers" because people in similar businesses had not communicated with each other. "The group felt very under-the-radar and very fragmented," she said.
Once they started seeing what they had in common, cluster members established three priority areas: Work force preparation, export development and promotion (including joint marketing at trade shows), and one-voice advocacy.
Much of the cluster's effort is tied to the proposed water tech center, and not only for improved research and development. Already, trade delegations from around the world visit the San Joaquin Valley because of its reputation for agricultural production, Swearengen said. However, to learn about the latest in water technology, those visitors have to go from farm to farm to see individual components. The water tech center would showcase the region's technical and manufacturing capabilities in one place.
Fresno State has agreed to donate land for the center, and cluster leaders believe a requested $2 million federal grant will receive approval. If the federal money comes through, it will leverage private sector donations, Swearengen said.
In the meantime, the work force program is moving forward. Cluster members agreed they had trouble finding certified welders, CNC machinists and maintenance mechanics. Manufacturing, noted Swearengen, is the heart and sole of the cluster.
"This is an area of huge unemployment," said Laval, "but you can't find anybody that you need."
The cluster is working with the two community colleges, which already have vocational programs but experience high drop-out rates, said Russ Densmore, a cluster member and vice president of operations for American AVK, which makes valves and fire hydrants. The cluster is setting up internships and work experience programs to encourage students to finish two-year vocational programs and to provide workplace skills.
The cluster is focused on growing existing businesses, a strategy recommended in the original Great Valley Center study. Everyone involved agrees that growth will require greater export of products and technology. Some companies already have an international presence – American AVK is owned by a Danish holding company, for example — while others need help making connections overseas.
And there is hope that new water tech companies will open in the region, and existing businesses located elsewhere will move to the valley.
"We're already beginning to see people moving into this area because they see all of the testing and research facilities in the area," said Laval, who noted two small companies from Montana and Oklahoma have relocated.
In the end, what cluster members want to see is more decent-paying jobs available in the region. Past economic development efforts have focused on call centers and logistics, which often pay little above minimum wage, noted Laval, a member of the Fresno Business Council. Certified welders typically command $20 to $25 per hour, he noted.
Contacts:
Ashley Swearengen, Central California Futures Institute, (559) 278-8433.
Claude Laval, Water Technology Industry Cluster, (559) 255-1601.
Russ Densmore, American AVK, (559) 452-4300.
International Center for Water Technology website: www.icwt.net
Economic Future of the San Joaquin Valley study: www.greatvalley.org/nvc/nvc_publications.aspx
As the popularity of motor sports, especially stock car racing, blossomed during the late 1990s and 2000s, a number of would-be race track developers and local government officials in California pursued high-speed economic dreams. However, actually building a race track in California has proven to be far more difficult than proposing a track and even winning development entitlements.
The City of Tulare has officially given up on a proposed speedway. The premature checkered flag for the Tulare Motor Sports Complex is hardly a surprise.
On the surface, auto racing tracks seem like a sexy way to generate big economic returns. Cities such as Indianapolis, Charlotte and Daytona Beach owe a good portion of their existence to auto racing. But these places are the exception, as numerous other cities have learned over the last decade.
Faced with rapidly declining revenues and extremely difficult budget choices, local governments are starting to invent their own economic stimulus programs. Cities have begun loaning money to car dealerships, cutting development fees, promoting buy-local programs and undertaking new redevelopment projects, among other things.
The City of Bell's plan to purchase property from the federal government and lease it to a railroad for use as a truck yard has been stalled and possibly killed by an environmental justice organization's successful California Environmental Quality Act lawsuit. The litigation has also raised questions about $35 million in bonds that the city issued in 2007 to fund property acquisition and improvements.
With an economy based on construction, shipping and warehousing, and heavy industry – and with some of the most conservative politics in the state – the Inland Empire would appear to be an unlikely place for a "green" movement. However, a public-private initiative is under way that seeks nothing less than a transformation of the region to one based on green technology and sustainable living.
Voters in the northern Solano County city of Dixon will decide in April on a project that could change the nature of town: A horse racing track and entertainment center capable of handling events for up to 50,000 people, plus more than 1 million square feet of hotel, entertainment, retail and office development.
Stanislaus County, the City of Patterson, and a North Carolina-based developer have teamed together on a business park that all parties hope will bring employment to an area that has seen rapid housing development but minimal job growth.
Despite a sluggish California economy, the state agency charged with business development and job creation appears to be in for a substantial downsizing.
An economic downturn that has forced up Bay Area unemployment and office vacancy rates shows little sign of abating. Business leaders, economic development experts and analysts say that righting the greater Bay Area's economic ship will be neither easy nor quick.
Sutter County is once again pursing a major development near the Sacramento International Airport. A specific plan the county adopted earlier this year calls for a 3,500-acre industrial and commercial development that would be a job center for the region.
Three counties in the eastern Bay Area are in position to capitalize on a predicted boom in the biotechnology industry, according to a new report. Alameda, Contra Costa and Solano counties, in fact, could be in better position than other locales in the Bay Area to accommodate manufacturing and distribution of new biotech products.
Generating economic activity at Norton Air Force Base in San Bernardino has proven to be difficult since the base closed in 1994. But Norton is now the scene of a proposal to replicate a successful airport in Texas that was built during the 1980s solely for industrial users.