The California High-Speed Rail Authority finds itself living something of a double life these days. The authority has received great interest since the September 11 terrorist attacks, yet the authoirty is going broke and could close down in 2002.

The phenomenon of powerful neighborhood groups holding sway over the planning process makes me question the wisdom of mixing democracy and planning. In principal, democracy should be the preferred route for making decisions about the public realm. But democracy, in large part, is about making deals among competing interests, and not all interest groups — such as people who champion affordable housing, schools, open space and urban design — are sitting at the table when homeowners cut their deals w

In anticipation of another raid on local government revenues by the State of California, local government officials have taken a page from grass-roots planning advocates and filed for two versions of initiatives for the state's November 2002 ballot. The "Local Revenue Accountability Act" is spearheaded by the state's leading city, county, and special district advocacy organizations – whose members are the largest employers of urban planners in California.

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the validity of a City of Lodi ordinance intended to force the cleanup of contaminated land and groundwater. Although it struck down a few provisions of Lodi's comprehensive law, the court ruled against insurance companies that contended federal and state "Superfund" laws prevented Lodi from imposing its own cleanup regulations.

CP&DR's complete election results for November 2001.

An assessment levied by Sacramento County on nonprofit organizations that conduct bingo games did not violate a 1994 initiative barring the imposition of a tax or fee on a nonprofit group's income, the Third District Court of Appeal has ruled. However, the appellate panel sent the case back to the trial court to determine whether the fees were closely related enough to county expenses to be legal.

The Proposition 62 requirement that a tax measure receive two-thirds approval by a City Council before going to voters does not apply to charter law cities, the First District Court of Appeal has ruled.

California is an expansive state, but most people live and work in a series of spaces that are – proportionally – rather small. It may seem like it takes forever to traverse metropolitan Los Angeles or the San Francisco Bay Area, but these population centers make up only a tiny portion of the state's overall land area.

Local governments that float Marks-Roos bonds have a fiduciary responsibility to the investors who hold the bonds – but not to the property owners who provide the revenue to make the bond payments, the Third District Court of Appeal has ruled.

The City of Industry has purchased a 2,400-acre Boy Scout camp in the hills outside of town. The acquisition and Industry's plans for the property have spurred a major fight between Industry and a collection of environmentalists and officials from neighboring jurisdictions.

One year ago, the water district that serves portions of Alameda and Contra Costa counties reached a tentative agreement with other local and federal agencies on a plan to divert water from the Sacramento River. Supporters of the plan said it would benefit many different parties.

Development supporters fared better than slow-growth advocates during November's off-year election with few land use ballot measures. The pro-growth side won seven of the ten measures on local ballots that had obvious growth implications.

Constructing a golf course is a legitimate use of public parkland, the Fourth District Court of Appeal has ruled. The court ruled against an Orange County citizens group that alleged the county government was improperly using land dedicated for a park.

The state Supreme Court has agreed hear to an unusual case from the Sonoma County city of Cotati that involves both mobile home rent control and an alleged strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP).