Follow us on Facebook and Twitter
Subscribe to our Free Weekly Enewsletter
Reports
Insight
Legal Digest
News Briefs
Blogs
Podcasts
Job Announcements
Single Purchase Store
1986-2004 Reports Archive
But appellate justices say state was correct that aesthetics is a subjective matter and not inherently a significant impact. >>read more
Drillers claim city should have done a full environmental impact report and misinterpreted CEQA guidance on mineral resources. >>read more
100% affordable project can't be struck down based on subjective standards or lack of strict adherence to specific plan policies. CEQA exemption based on Downtown Specific Plan was also upheld. >>read more
State's 2045 goals could also upend CEQA practice and do away with thresholds. >>read more
Appellate court rejected anti-SLAPP motion, saying San Anselmo lawsuit was meritless and lawyer was "indifferent". >>read more
Tentative People's Park ruling raises specter of NIMBYs using demographic information to challenge projects. >>read more
SB 9 implementation, Builder's Remedy, the Berkeley enrollment case and more highlighted this year's planning and development news. >>read more
In striking down Capitol Annex EIR, Third District tells the state which visuals to use and which alternatives to examine. >>read more
In both cases, community groups' efforts to use CEQA failed. >>read more
The latest twist in the strange tale of Terraces of Lafayette could have huge implications statewide. >>read more
Planner IV, County of Santa Cruz
Senior Associate, Strategic Economics
Assistant Community Development Director, City of Mountain View
Positions Available: MINTIER HARNISH:ASSOCIATE ASSISTANT PLANNER PLANNER
Director of Land Use Services, San Bernardino County
Planning Director. City of Mt. Shasta
- (place your job ad here!)